We have a fundamental right to bear arms; the various states and cities cannot infringe on these rights, barring certain restrictions. Outright bans were not upheld in Washington DC (Heller, last year) and Chicago - Oak Park this year. We still have to sort out what restrictions are valid (mentally impaired and felons can of course be restricted; but if you've kept your nose clean, and you're not a drooling kook, you are legally empowered to own and have guns).
Chicago, New York State and City, get over it.
The justices said the two cities involved in Monday's case—Chicago and Oak Park, Ill.—went too far with ordinances that effectively banned possession of handguns in the home.Justice Stevens, in his final dissent, was a rambling fool, and thankfully is retired.
"It is clear that the framers and ratifiers of the 14th Amendment counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty," wrote Justice Samuel Alito in his majority opinion. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined all or part of the opinion.
Now, we have to oppose this book-banning person, Ivy Leaguer Elena Kagan. You know if she would argue to allow a law to stand that would ban books, she would fully support laws to ban or overly restrict guns, as always has been the desire of Democrats and the Left. This woman is a danger to our Republic, and we should duly filibuster her nomination.
This video shows a complete Supreme Slapdown of Elena Kagan, and illustrates her lack of ability to cogently argue a case at the Supreme Court level.
Just like Obama: not qualified to serve at high level.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Have a comment? Not a liar or a griefer, a spammer or a foul internet troll?
Feel free to comment, then.
Not getting published? See the "Complaints" tab. All comments to this blog are reviewed before being published, on my schedule.
And I am very busy.