
~*~!
Without God, Humans are but Animals.
These steps are no substitute for immigration reform, the future of which seems pretty murky after Mr. Obama started gingerly backing away this week. But the federal government must react forcefully to the Arizona statute. Is our core belief still the welcome and assimilation of newcomers? Arizona has given one answer. It’s time for Mr. Obama to give the other.(Barack Obama has backed far away from Immigration Reform. Be sure to see the plaintive photo I posted with the #Arizona protester's poster board begging Barack Obama for a 'savior moment'.)
The withdrawal of Charlie Crist, Florida's moderate governor, from the Republican primary has left the way clear for conservative favourite Marco Rubio to claim the party's nomination.I would've written "Barack Obama's far-left statist agenda", but that's too much truth for a main stream publication to write and publish.
Hailed as the first member of the Tea Party to have the potential to break into the Senate, Rubio has risen from political obscurity a year ago to poster boy for the Right-wing populist movement that has spread across the country in reaction to President Barack Obama's liberal agenda.
1) We are Chicanas and Chicanos of Aztlán reclaiming the land of our birth (Chicana/Chicano Nation);Now, the Hispanic community is galvanized by Arizona's daring move to usurp the power of the Obama administration, Governor Jan Brewer was forced to sign the bill into law because Obama and his DHS chief, Janet Napolitano, have had ample opportunities to defend the borders of the very state where Napolitano was once governor, but no! there were other pressing issues that came first: healthcare, climate change &c. Defending the borders of this county, hah! What, do you think that's in the constitution or something? Meanwhile, Phoenix became the Kidnapping Capitol of the United States.
2) Aztlán belongs to indigenous people, who are sovereign and not subject to a foreign culture;
3) We are a union of free pueblos forming a bronze (Chicana/Chicano) Nation;
4) Chicano nationalism, as the key to mobilization and organization, is the common denominator to bring consensus to the Chicana/Chicano Movement;
5) Cultural values strengthen our identity as La Familia de La Raza; and
6) EPA, as a basic plan of Chicana/Chicano liberation, sought the formation of an independent national political party that would represent the sentiments of the Chicana/Chicano community.

Har Har Hardee Har Har indeed.In Fort Madison, loudest cheers AFTER Obama leaves

One of my favorite signs at the tax day tea party in Washington, D.C. held up by the the Christo-fascist, flag waving, gun toting, racist, white power fueled, anti-semetic, neo-nazi, homophobic teabaggers, or whatever the Democrats are calling tea partiers these days, was “My ‘n’ word is November.”
The guy who held it up was there with his wife. Her sign said, “I only play a racist on MSNBC.”
Let's focus, for a minute, on the essay's vapid attempt to assert the existence of a "white privilege" which allows anyone and everyone who is white to threaten others, engage in violent and incendiary rhetoric, and to be viewed as patriotic, instead of extremist and pathetic.There's more at the link to Washington Rebel, a blog I've just discovered. New in the reader, where I just made room by kicking out one who annoyed me. Shit happens.
Let's imagine.
Imagine that hundreds of black protesters were to descend upon Washington DC and Northern Virginia,just a few miles from the Capitol and White House, armed with AK-47s,assorted handguns, and ammunition. And imagine that some of these protesters--the black protesters--spoke of the need for political revolution, and possibly even armed conflict in the event that laws they didn’t like were enforced by the government. Would these protesters--these black protesters with guns--be seen as brave defenders of the Second Amendment, or would they be viewed by most whites as a danger to the republic? What if they were Arab-Americans? Because, after all, that's what happened recently when white gun enthusiasts descended upon the nation's capital, arms in hand, and verbally announced their readiness to make war on the country's political leaders if the need arose.Now, imagine hundreds of thousands of black men descending upon Washington DC , demanding that "their" issues be placed on the national agenda - issues based on nothing but race - led by a radical orator and proven hater of Jews, who has openly and vocally displayed his hatred, calling Judaism a "gutter religion ," accused the government of manufacturing the H1N1 flu vaccine in order to depopulate the earth, and another radical leader who specializes in race baiting and blackmail.
The offending video also features Al Gore in a jail cell between a couple nice gals. Just where I'd like to see him...Climate Scientist, Heated Up Over Satirical Video,
The Penn State climate professor who has silently endured investigations, hostile questioning, legislative probes and attacks by colleagues has finally spoken out. He says he'll sue the makers of a satirical video that's a hit on You Tube.
Threatens Lawsuit
Their response: Bring it on.
Michael Mann, one of the central figures in the recent climate-data scandal, is best known for his "hockey stick graph," which was the key visual aid in explaining how the world is warming at an alarming rate and in connecting the rise to the increase in use of carbon fuels in this century. E-mails stolen from a university in England were released online, revealing exchanges between climatologists and a reference to a "trick" that Mann had used to get the graph to portray what global warming scientists wanted to see.
The parody video, titled "Hide the Decline," had more than 500,000 viewers on YouTube and received national attention when Rush Limbaugh played it on his radio show. It features a cat with a guitar, a talking tree, and a dancing figure sporting the image of Professor Mann. It's the use of his image that Mann is complaining about, arguing that the video supports "efforts sell various products and merchandise."
"The guy is crazy to threaten legal action," said Jeff Davis, the President of No Cap and Trade, a large organization that includes the group Mann is threatening to sue, Minnesotans for Global Warming. "A lawsuit would give us full discovery -- and there's a lot to look at in his work."

“People think they’re free in this country,” Hatfill says. “Don’t kid yourself. This is a police state. The government can pretty much do whatever it wants.”and
“I was a guy who trusted the government,” he says. “Now, I don’t trust a damn thing they do.” He trusts reporters even less, dismissing them as little more than lapdogs for law enforcement.But the 'wrong man' won...
Four months later, the Justice Department quietly settled with Hatfill for $5.82 million. “It allowed Doc to start over,” Connolly, his lawyer, says....
In addition to suing the Justice Department for violating his privacy and The New York Times for defaming him, Hatfill also brought a libel lawsuit against Don Foster, Vanity Fair, and Reader’s Digest, which had reprinted Foster’s article. The lawsuit led to a settlement whose dollar amount all parties have agreed to keep confidential. The news media, which had for so long savaged Hatfill, dutifully reported his legal victories, but from where he stands, that hardly balanced things on the ledger sheet of journalistic fairness....this time. Because he was a rare bird, a man who didn't completely collapse under the government's onslaught. But his experience hasn't made him an America-hater...
“My country didn’t do this to me,” he is quick to point out. “A bloated, incompetent bureaucracy and a broken press did. I wouldn’t be doing what I’m doing today if I didn’t still love my country.”h/t Jim Treacher, who, so far, is not so lucky.
THE RAVEN

Hubris at WacoRead the post at Volkoh; the review excerpt chosen by Kenneth Anderson details the questionable use of CS tear gas on a civilian 'target'(s). And, suggests that the CS tear gas was intended to cause Branch Davidian mother's angst at their children suffering from effects of the gas, because there were no child-sized tear gas masks available in the compound. If Bill Clinton and Janet Reno knowingly targeted the BD children with CS tear gas, then yes, he needs to be brought to trial for war crimes. Against civilians. In the USA.
The Times Literary Supplement (London)
Kenneth Anderson
01 September 1995
Dick J. Reavis, The Ashes of Waco, An investigation, 320pp. New York: Simon and Schuster. $24 - 0 684 81132 4.
Like most Americans, I was only vaguely aware of the months-long stand-off between David Koresh's Branch Davidian cult members and the Federal government at Waco, Texas, until April 19, 1993, when it blew up in flames and billowing smoke and some eighty-six people died, including twenty-five children.
True, I was surprised by the armada the FBI unleashed against the religionists' compound nine Bradley fighting vehicles, five combat engineering vehicles, one tank retrieval vehicle and two Abrams tanks. I was less surprised that the FBI used CS tear-gas in the compound; although over a hundred nations prohibit the use of CS gas in warfare, the United States has never conceded that it is prohibited for use in domestic disturbances. I was, however, troubled to learn that despite endless discussions of whether the highly flammable compound might ignite and whose fault that would be, there were no fire-engines at the compound at the time the FBI attack began (although the FBI did take the trouble to send an aeroplane equipped with advanced radar capabilities to fly over the compound, apparently in order to have evidence that if a fire broke out, the FBI had not started it). It took forty-one minutes for fire-fighters to arrive from nearby communities, by which time most of the eightysix dead were charred remains. Nearly three hours after the fire began, there were only nine ambulances at the scene. But despite questions about FBI tactics, I, like most Americans then and today, even following the summer's Congressional hearings, was willing to write off Waco as another of those inevitable shoot-outs between law enforcement and various strange religious sects that punctuate American history every few years.
Writing this review has convinced me I was quite wrong. The actions of the Federal government at Waco, both in relation to how the enterprise was conceived and to how it was defended to the public afterwards, clearly show that (indeed, as various gun nuts, self-styled "patriots" and other right-wing populists have been insisting for two years now) Waco was not just a case of incompetent government responding to something that it couldn't leave alone, but represents a general and disturbing claim by the government about its authority over all American citizens. For, as Gary Wills wrote recently when discussing the Oklahoma
bombing in the New York Review of Books (August 10, 1995), there "is something new" in the claims of these right-wing groups, by comparison to conspiracy theorists throughout American history, and the reason is that it is hard, as Wills says, "to trace the exact line where extremism spills over into 'mainstream' concerns about liberty". They are something new because the assertion of what might be called "liberal authoritarianism", which is now embedded in law-enforcement bureaucracies and which motivated the FBI at Waco, is itself something "new", at least in its virulence and reach.
The Tea Party is simply a thing of beauty. Never have I seen such an outpouring of patriotism and good cheer and optimism all in one place as the Tea Party rallies that I’ve been honored to attend.Democrats and these lefty trolls (exemplified and empowered by the likes of Markos Moulitsas), they've been slapped down by the CBO, and they are facing November.
...
This is a view of the Tea Party that Frank Rich doesn’t want to acknowledge. The Left will be drawn to the most extreme posters and the inescapable occasional angry sound bite on the evening news to make their case that we’re all just a bunch of angry crazies.
And they will do their best to do what Rich did in the New York Times and try to play their ultimate trump card: that the Tea Party doesn’t like black people.
They are obsessed with the notion that criticism of President Obama just stems from bigots who can’t get over the fact that a black man is in the Oval Office.
Let’s face it: it’s all they’ve got. It’s the best they can do. They cannot dispute the numbers crunched by the Congressional Budget Office. They can’t pretend to ignore the legion of medical doctors who are angry and frightened and disgusted by what Obama Care will do to their practices. They know that government cannot possibly expect to rack up obscene spending and hope for a decreasing deficit.
The Oklahoma City bombing was 15 years ago today, and Clinton chooses to honor the memory of the people who were murdered by using them to chastise those who oppose a Democratic administration. Again. As Byron York recalls:Oh, and 80% of Americans say they can't trust Washington.
Clinton was in deep political trouble in April 1995. Six months earlier, voters had resoundingly rejected Democrats in the 1994 mid-term elections, giving the GOP control of both House and Senate. Polls showed the public viewed Clinton as weak, incompetent and ineffective. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and his GOP forces seized the initiative on virtually every significant issue, while Clinton appeared to be politically dead. The worst moment may have come on April 18, the day before the bombing, when Clinton plaintively told reporters, “The president is still relevant here.”
And then came the explosion at the Murrah Federal Building. In addition to seeing a criminal act and human loss, Clinton and Morris saw opportunity. If the White House could tie Gingrich, congressional Republicans and conservative voices like Rush Limbaugh to the attack, then Clinton might gain the edge in the fight against the GOP.
Back to my favorite punching bag, Bill (What's That Under My Desk?!) Clinton. Seems he's now nearly a worse ex-president than the other Democrat ex-president, consummate fool Jimmy Carter.
Only 22 percent of all Americans surveyed say they trust the government in Washington almost always or most of the time -- among the lowest measures in half a century - according to a new Pew Research Center survey released tonight.
The results point to "a perfect storm'' of public unrest, Pew reports -- "a dismal economy, an unhappy public, (a) bitter, partisan-based backlash and epic discontent with Congress and elected officials.
"Growing numbers of people want the power of government curtailed,'' Pew reports of a mid-March survey that has found "less of an appetite for government solutions to the nation's problems - including more government control over the economy - than there was when Barack Obama first took office...
"The public's hostility toward government seems likely to be an important election issue favoring the Republicans this fall,'' Pew reports. "However, the Democrats can take some solace in the fact that neither party can be confident that they have the advantage among such a disillusioned electorate. Favorable ratings for both major parties, as well as for Congress, have reached record lows while opposition to congressional incumbents, already approaching an alltime high, continues to climb.''
There have been political ramifications in the past when the public mood grew this sour: In 1980, Ronald Reagan unseated President Jimmy Carter. In 1994, the GOP won the House.
All money in the United States, except coins, is created as someone's debt. When our nation spends more than it takes in, a deficit is created and our government "borrows" the money mainly from commercial banks. As the debt builds, so does the interest. As the interest takes up a larger percentage of the budget, real programs get squeezed.We're well on the way to becoming a second-rate debtor nation. Poor, and broke as hell. Sort of like Cuba, where we find this Cuban dirty socialist, who fought for Castro and turned out last week to give more support for dirty socialism... Veteran Raul Ramirez attends the 49th anniversary of Fidel Castro's announcement of Cuba becoming a socialist state in Havana, Friday, April 16, 2010. Ramirez, 82, fought in Cuba's revolution that toppled dictator Fulgencio Batista and brought Fidel Castro to power 51 years ago. (AP Photo/Javier Galeano)
The latest example of the squeeze is Obama's announcement cancelling future manned space flights. No more advancing the human race in space, it's too expensive. NASA's total annual budget? $18 billion. Amount spent on interest on just the current national debt? At the traditional rate of 5% it will total more than $700 Billion in 2010! But guess what? While the Treasury Department reports that "only" $383 billion was spent on interest last year..., ...the real amount of money spent on interest last year alone nearly equals the total amount of money our government takes in!
Please let that sink in.
The Estefans may have broken more than a rule when they decided to host a cocktail reception for the president during his visit to South Florida on Thursday. Estefan, along with husband Emilio, also broke a bond that had united them with Miami's Cuban community, whose members largely oppose the president's agenda.
...
They are hosting a $30,400-a-couple fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee, and, by extension, helping to fund the entire Democratic Party agenda. It's a proactive, partisan stance that goes well beyond, say, deciding to sing at a presidential inauguration or accepting a presidential appointment to oversee a nonpartisan cause.
...
Mention the Estefans and many no longer conjure up images of freedom and catchy tunes. Now -- rightly or wrongly -- many associate the name with Obamacare, abortion, powerful unions, creation of a welfare state. [emboldenings mine]
They entered a capital that had become a military encampment, with camo-wearing military police in Humvees and enough Army vehicles to make it look like a May Day parade on New York Avenue, where a bicyclist was killed Monday by a National Guard truck.There's your 'open and free dialogue' Obama promised during his lying election campaign ..."to be the most open and transparent ever."
In the middle of it all was Obama -- occupant of an office once informally known as "leader of the free world" -- putting on a clinic for some of the world's greatest dictators in how to circumvent a free press.
The only part of the summit, other than a post-meeting news conference, that was visible to the public was Obama's eight-minute opening statement, which ended with the words: "I'm going to ask that we take a few moments to allow the press to exit before our first session."
Reporters for foreign outlets, admitted for the first time to the White House press pool, got the impression that the vaunted American freedoms are not all they're cracked up to be.
Obama's official schedule for Tuesday would have pleased China's Central Committee. Excerpts: "The President will attend the Heads of Delegation working lunch. This lunch is closed press. . . . The President will meet with Prime Minster Erdogan of Turkey. This meeting is closed press. . . . The President will attend Plenary Session II of the Nuclear Security Summit. This session is closed press."That will be a hoot. Robert Gibbs is a buffoon who represents a secretive president, one who's fooled a full 54% of the voting public. At least for awhile, he fooled that many people. He's lost a large swath of independent voters. But since he can continue to provide handouts and 'free shit' to his core moochers people, they might be seeing the problems inherent in this administration, but won't say or do anything that might interfere with the candy. Good Americans, aren't they all?
Reporters, even those on the White House beat for two decades, said these were the most restricted such meetings they had ever seen. They complained to both the administration and White House Correspondents' Association, which will discuss the matter Thursday with White House press secretary Robert Gibbs.
The restrictions have become a common practice for the Obama White House. When Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu came to the White House a couple of weeks ago, reporters were kept away. Soon after that, Obama signed an executive order on abortion, again without any coverage.The most open presidency, evah! "My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government." Oh, but when he speaks, he sounds almost believable, doesn't he?
Over the weekend, Obama broke with years of protocol and slipped off to a soccer game without the "protective" pool that is always in the vicinity of the president in case the unthinkable occurs. Obama joked about it later to Pakistan's prime minister, saying reporters "were very upset."
"We are proud of these accomplishments, but our work is not done," Obama said. "We will continue to work toward an unmatched level of transparency, participation and accountability across the entire administration."Those of you who are STILL Obama supporters, aren't you proud?
Supporters of a new ecocide law also believe it could be used to prosecute “climate deniers” who distort science and facts to discourage voters and politicians from taking action to tackle global warming and climate change.Come get me, biatches.
“Ecocide is in essence the very antithesis of life,” says Higgins. “It leads to resource depletion, and where there is escalation of resource depletion, war comes chasing behind. Where such destruction arises out of the actions of mankind, ecocide can be regarded as a crime against peace.”
The Brazilian government has given the green light to the construction of a controversial hydroelectric dam in the Amazon rainforest that environmentalists and indigenous activists claim will displace indigenous tribes and further damage the Amazon basin.There were many people in the U.S. who opposed the construction of the TVA's series of flood-control and energy generating hydroelectric dams that are now a mainstay of our grid.
The proposed construction of the Belo Monte dam in the Amazon state of Para is part of a major government investment drive to help the country keep up with soaring energy demand from a rapidly expanding economy, while curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Hydroelectric power produces no direct carbon dioxide.Just as is needed in any country. We could probably use a few more here in the U.S., and even Obama realizes we need more nuclear power plants.

We are all losers now.Health care overhaul spawns mass confusion for public
WASHINGTON — Two weeks after President Barack Obama signed the big health care overhaul into law, Americans are struggling to understand how — and when — the sweeping measure will affect them.
Questions reflecting confusion have flooded insurance companies, doctors' offices, human resources departments and business groups.
"They're saying, 'Where do we get the free Obama care, and how do I sign up for that?'"
"We tell them it's not free, that there are going to be things in place that help people who are low-income, but that ultimately most of that is not going to be taking place until 2014," McLean said.

Obama Is Not the Antichrist—And Nobody Really Thinks He IsI didn't think he was that bad. But as far as being a unprincipled dirty socialist ideologue who wants to transform our Nation into something that will likely lead to the Soviet Union-style collapse of our Republic, well, that still remains to be seen.
Survey: Four in 10 Tea Party members are Democrats or independentsJeff Goldstein's wondering where, exactly, is the violence that's predicted by all the fainting pearl clutchers?
The national breakdown of the Tea Party composition is 57 percent Republican, 28 percent Independent and 13 percent Democratic, according to three national polls by the Winston Group, a Republican-leaning firm that conducted the surveys on behalf of an education advocacy group. Two-thirds of the group call themselves conservative, 26 are moderate and 8 percent say they are liberal.
By using the word "regime," Limbaugh was doing something he does all the time: throwing the language of the opposition back in their faces. In the Bush years, we often heard the phrase "Bush regime" from some quarters of the left. So Limbaugh applied it to Obama.I'm not accessing Nexis as Bryon York did, but Bing finds 9.350M answering hits, including the official Wiki entry for the "Presidency of George W. Bush", lovingly answering to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_regime.
Apparently some people didn't get it. On MSNBC, Chris Matthews appeared deeply troubled by the word. "I've never seen language like this in the American press," he said, "referring to an elected representative government, elected in a totally fair, democratic, American election -- we will have another one in November, we'll have another one for president in a couple years -- fair, free, and wonderful democracy we have in this country…. We know that word, 'regime.' It was used by George Bush, 'regime change.' You go to war with regimes. Regimes are tyrannies. They're juntas. They're military coups. The use of the word 'regime' in American political parlance is unacceptable, and someone should tell the walrus [Limbaugh] to stop using it."
