Buddy, you needs get your medications adjusted. Or find a doc who'll give you the good stuff.
See, all this time you've spent crapping around annoying your betters on blogs, you could've composed the next huge guitar concerto solo that would've wowed! the world! Instead, you've annoyed Big Fur Hat, you've been pwned at IOTW, and for what reason?
You can't stay up all night trying to make others believe the way you believe. You don't have enough necessary mental capacity to change any thinking minds. You play well to your paella arugula hangers-on, but that's it.
So pick up a guitar pick and do what you do best: pick with the damned thing. Your cat will appreciate it, if no one else will!
Embarrassing MTSU? Do you think for a second that President McPhee wouldn't appreciate a faculty member who would speak up about a blog like this?
ReplyDeleteI spoke with BFH today. He's not as dumb as you are. Actually, he is non-religious, pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, etc .... a bit of an Islamophobe ... but in a sensible way. He plays to his minions and has claimed some success in moderating the fundamentalist views of his readers.
I respect the fact that he's trying to make a living so I agreed not to rattle his cage. He came close, but stopped short of libel, unlike Jeff Goldstein who clearly broke the law.
Hey, that pshop's pretty good! Obama as a pre-aborted fetus event. Obviously intended as a science-fiction piece, for to spur thoughts, and it works at that level: because we can't tell at the fetus stage exactly what a person will be when she or he is properly grown and birthed. And, Obama is abortion-supportive, having said he doesn't want his daughters 'punished with a baby'. He's also a Democrat, the Party of Abortion and Atheism. So, that 'shopped image works on several levels. And, of course, it's First Amendment protected.
ReplyDeleteHow many babies better'n Obama have been aborted over the decades since Roe v. Wade was enacted, I wonder?
You, obviously, missed those crucial points. You reacted, as expected, as a butt-hurt LeftLibProgg who went off half-cocked, as you've done so many times before.
Why did you choose that particular example as the 'worst of the blog', one that Prof McPhee would also disavow, and approve of your strange and unusual activities? It's easily defended.
Do you think you made any difference at all in BFH or his reader's opinions? I think not.
But obviously your activity did sooth (temporarily) whatever bit of your own inner brain is broken, long enough for you to recover and seek out a new row.
Oh, but I'm glad to see you've learned to leave Jeff G and pw alone. I told you years ago, way back on Tennessee Free, that you'd not met the minimum IQ level to troll pw. I was right. That was an epic FAIL.
Now, it seems, you can't even troll IOTW, which hasn't quite the same level of erudite pundits.
So, who's next? Did you try out Ace's blog? How'd that work out for you?
Let's see: pw, Patterico, One Cosmos, IOTW, a couple others. Fail, fail, fail, fail. No one all of a sudden became a LeftLibProgg and followed you out 'into the light', did they?
Sheesh, man, you're wasting your time. Hang it up.
I was instrumental in forcing PW to go to a registration format. That is a victory. Why do I do it? It's fun. I enjoy putting facts into people's faces they find uncomfortable - particularly people who are extremists, fundamentalists, and can not see a bigger picture.
ReplyDeleteFor example, I think BFH must have deleted this video a dozen times. Imagine... a conservative so uncomfortable so as to delete a video of Ronald Reagan.
I consider that a point made.
Both he and I know I'm not going to change his reader's opinions. But maybe, the smart ones, stopped to think for a minute. Most of his readers are old white guys like you that enjoy the Obama bashing, Muslim fear, and ocassional bikini posts.
What BFH and other bloggers need to realize, I'm not their only boogyman and anon proxy IP user. It got to the point where Goldstein and BFH - and their readers were attributing posts to me I did not make.
As my lovely girlfriend is an accomplished lawyer who just successfully defended an internet defamation suit. I'm certain my comments are protected under our 1st Amendment - you know that constitution thing that conservatives love so much (...love so much they want to change it)?
Hypocrisy is rampant in your brethren.
I was instrumental in forcing PW to go to a registration format.
ReplyDeleteA damned lie. I know who was responsible for that change; you were not near important enough to even register on the scale. As far as trolls go, you are but a mosquito-bite minor annoyance; predictable and easily sprayed. Once we found out who you were, a g00gle search of your name and MTSU reveals a wealth of data. That's a nice thing to have out there, isn't it?
But the very fact that you admit that your 'attacks' are designed to disrupt legitimate business operations is an important thing to have on record; that comment may well be admissible in a future legal action against you. Thanks! for that (I have screenshots, so deleting that comment won't work, sorry!).
You imaginary lawyer girlfriend should've told you that 1st Amendment rights are only apply to and are enforceable against Government, not against non-government entities - especially those that have already asked you to cease and desist. You have no 1st Amendment rights to comment, harass or annoy others on blog sites you don't own or run, sorry.
And the 'attributing posts to me I did not make' is a smoke screen. You did make all of those posts, by proxy; you are instantly recognizable as...you. You've apparently ginned up so many mirrors of your splintered and twisted personality you can't even keep track of 'em.
That's sad.